The question of what makes a system truly decentralized has been at the forefront of technological discourse for years. Yet, as we examine existing implementations, we find that decentralization exists on a spectrum rather than as a binary state.

In this post, I explore three key dimensions of decentralization: architectural, political, and logical. Each dimension presents unique challenges and trade-offs that system designers must carefully consider.

Architectural Decentralization

Architectural decentralization refers to the physical structure of a system. How many computers does it run on? How many of those computers can it tolerate breaking down at any single time? Traditional centralized systems run on a single server or cluster, creating obvious points of failure.

However, architectural decentralization alone is insufficient. Many distributed systems achieve fault tolerance through replication while maintaining centralized control structures.

← Show less

Traditional mechanism design assumes rational actors operating with perfect information. However, real-world systems must account for bounded rationality, social preferences, and the complex interplay between individual incentives and collective outcomes.

Through examining several case studies from both digital and physical systems, we can identify patterns that lead to more robust and human-compatible mechanisms.

← Show less